Происхождение нефти газа: от теории происхождения к технологиям поисков > Теоретические вопросы происхождения нефти
Нефть неорганическая VS органическая, аргументы за и против
Шевченко Николай Борисович:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/9610011.pdf
arXiv:physics/9610011v1 [physics.ao-ph] 15 Oct 1996
THE NON-ORGANIC THEORY OF THE GENESIS OF PETROLEUM
Samar Abbas
Dept. of Physics ,Utkal University
Bhubaneswar-751004, India
--- Цитировать ---Abstract
Recent advances in interdisciplinary fields as diverse as astrophysics, cosmo-
geophysics, nuclear geology, etc. have led to interesting developments in the
non-organic theory of the genesis of petroleum. This theory , which holds
that petroleum is of an abiogenic primordial origin, provides an explanation
for certain features of petroleum geology that are hard to explain within
the standard organic framework. If the non-organic theory i s correct, then
hydrocarbon reserves would be enormous and almost inexhaus table.
--- Конец цитаты ---
::)
Шевченко Николай Борисович:
http://www.minsocam.org/msa/rim/RiMG075/RiMG075_Ch14.pdf
Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry
Vol. 75 pp. 449-465, 2013
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of America
On the Origins of Deep Hydrocarbons
Mark A. Sephton, Robert M. Hazen
--- Цитировать ---...When crystalline rock reservoirs are considered in a global context, it becomes clear that they represent less than 1% of the world’s petroleum deposits. The remaining 99% points to an overwhelming correlation of petroleum with sedimentary rocks, indicating a likely origin from sedimentary organic matter (Ulmishek and Klemme 1991).
--- Конец цитаты ---
:P
Вроде не дилетанты и учили петрографию где типы горных пород разложены по полочкам
Вроде ясно показано, что есть ОСАДОЧНЫЕ, МАГМАТИЧЕСКИЕ И МЕТАМОРФИЧЕСКИЕ ПОРОДЫ. Из этого вытекает, что по своим фильтрационно-емкостным свойствам метаморфические породы практически аналогичны магматическим.
Поэтому и считать глобально нужно с учётом петрографии, а не безнадёжно устаревших представлений на созревание и эмиграцию нефти из глины "нефтематеринских" осадочных пород.
::)
Тимурзиев Ахмет Иссакович:
Международный проект Deep Carbon Observatory (DCO), результаты 10-ти летних исследований:
Здесь полный список глав издания:
http://www.minsocam.org/msa/rim/rim75.html
Адрес полного сбоника:
http://www.minsocam.org/msa/rim/RiMG075/RiMG075_entire.pdf.zip
Volume 75: Carbon in Earth
Robert M. Hazen, Adrian P. Jones, and John A. Baross, editors
i-xv + 698 pages. ISBN 978-0-939950-90-4
Carbon in Earth is an outgrowth of the Deep Carbon Observatory (DCO), a 10-year international research effort dedicated to achieving transformational understanding of the chemical and biological roles of carbon in Earth (http://dco.ciw.edu). Hundreds of researchers from 6 continents, including all 51 coauthors of this volume, are now engaged in the DCO effort. This volume serves as a benchmark for our present understanding of Earth's carbon - both what we know and what we have yet to learn. Ultimately, the goal is to produce a second, companion volume to mark the progress of this decadal initiative.
This volume addresses a range of questions that were articulated in May 2008 at the First Deep Carbon Cycle Workshop in Washington, DC. At that meeting 110 scientists from a dozen countries set forth the state of knowledge about Earth's carbon. They also debated the key opportunities and top objectives facing the community. Subsequent deep carbon meetings in Bejing, China (2010), Novosibirsk, Russia (2011), and Washington, DC (2012), as well as more than a dozen smaller workshops, expanded and refined the DCO's decadal goals. The 20 chapters that follow elaborate on those opportunities and objectives.
A striking characteristic of Carbon in Earth is the multidisciplinary scientific approach necessary to encompass this topic. The following chapters address such diverse aspects as the fundamental physics and chemistry of carbon at extreme conditions, the possible character of deep-Earth carbon-bearing minerals, the geodynamics of Earth's large-scale fluid fluxes, tectonic implications of diamond inclusions, geosynthesis of organic molecules and the origins of life, the changing carbon cycle through deep time, and the vast subsurface microbial biosphere (including the hidden deep viriosphere). Accordingly, the collective authorship of Carbon in Earth represents laboratory, field, and theoretical researchers from the full range of physical and biological sciences.
A hallmark of the DCO is the desire to implement advanced strategies in communications, data management, engagement, and visualization. Accordingly, this volume incorporates some novel aspects. Thanks to sponsorship by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, which continues to provide significant support for the DCO, this is the first of the RiMG series to be published as an Open Access volume.
Robert M. Hazen, Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington
Adrian P. Jones, University College London
John A. Baross, University of Washington
March 2013
Нужно всем ознакомиться и использовать в своей работе.
Suresh Bansal (India):
( When crystalline rock reservoirs are considered in a global context, it becomes clear that they represent less than 1% of the world's petroleum deposits. The remaining 99% points to an overwhelming correlation of petroleum with sedimentary rocks, indicating a likely origin from sedimentary organic matter (Ulmishek and Klemme 1991).)
ME; Here is big mistake only. this is just a assumption only that correlation of petroleum with sedimentary rocks, indicating a likely origin from sedimentary organic matter. otherwise it is not scientific. The fact is oils has been expelled only from those sedimentary source rocks that has been formed with the involvement of abiotic hydrocarbon bearing sludge that has been buried along with organic matter. Organic rich sedimentary rocks that has been formed without any involvement of this abiotic hydrocarbon bearing sludge are not suitable to form commercial interesting hydrocarbons and leads us to DRY HOLES. so abiotic sources are the major contributor in commercial interesting hydrocarbons also.
Suresh Bansal (India):
Regarding heading of this discussion "Oil VS inorganic, organic, arguments for and against" . In my opinion this heading should be as "Oil VS abiogenic,biogenic, arguments for and against" . Because Organic is not a guarantee of Biogenic also . It will be more better if we say fossil fuel or non fossil fuel .
Навигация
Перейти к полной версии